Business Necessity as a Discrimination Defense

HRCalifornia

If you maintain a practice that appears to be neutral, but creates an adverse impact on protected classes, you must prove that there is an overriding legitimate business purpose.

You must show that the practice is necessary to the safe and efficient operation of the business. You must also prove that the challenged practice effectively fulfills the business purpose it is designed to serve. A practice may not be permissible if an alternative practice would accomplish the business purpose equally well with a less discriminatory impact.1

1. Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971) ; 2 CCR sec. 11010

Become a member to view this content

This is a preview of premium content available exclusively to our members. For immediate access join now online or by phone at 800-331-8877. Not ready to buy? Schedule a demo or take a free trial.

Schedule a Demo

CalChamber is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy, and we’ll only use your personal information to administer your account and to provide the products and services you requested from us. From time to time, we would like to contact you about our products and services, as well as other content that may be of interest to you. If you consent to us contacting you for this purpose, please tick below to say how you would like us to contact you:

You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For more information on how to unsubscribe, our privacy practices, and how we are committed to protecting and respecting your privacy, please review our Privacy Policy.

By clicking Schedule my demo below, you consent to allow calchamber.com to store and process the personal information submitted above to provide you the content requested.

Website Feedback