Unequal (Disparate) Impact

HRCalifornia

An employment practice that appears to be neutral but, in practice, discriminates against protected classes creates a disparate impact, which violates anti-discrimination laws.1 A common example is a weight and height requirement that adversely impacts women but is not actually required for the job.

In disparate impact cases, an employer’s motivation to establish the particular employment practice is irrelevant. If an employee can show that an apparently neutral policy creates a harsher impact on a protected class, that policy is illegal unless the employer can show that the practice is job-related and consistent with business necessity.2 However, a3

Become a member to view this content

This is a preview of premium content available exclusively to our members. For immediate access join now online or by phone at 800-331-8877. Not ready to buy? Schedule a demo or take a free trial.

Schedule a Demo

CalChamber is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy, and we’ll only use your personal information to administer your account and to provide the products and services you requested from us. From time to time, we would like to contact you about our products and services, as well as other content that may be of interest to you. If you consent to us contacting you for this purpose, please tick below to say how you would like us to contact you:

You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For more information on how to unsubscribe, our privacy practices, and how we are committed to protecting and respecting your privacy, please review our Privacy Policy.

By clicking Schedule my demo below, you consent to allow calchamber.com to store and process the personal information submitted above to provide you the content requested.

Website Feedback