Discovery of Sex-Based Discrimination Invalidates Arbitration Agreement

HRCalifornia Now
A microphone on a stand with a person in a suit, seen from behind.

In 2021, Congress passed the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA), which allows victims of workplace sexual harassment and assault to invalidate mandatory arbitration agreements and pursue claims against their employers in court.

Recently, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals court held that an employee does not waive the protections of the EFAA simply by initiating arbitration before uncovering evidence of sex-based discrimination (Ding v. Structure Therapeutics, Inc., No. 25-1532 (9th Cir. Aug. 19, 2026)). This case highlights employers' legal vulnerability when adverse personnel decisions rely on gender stereotyping and third-party bias.

Become a member to view this content

This is a preview of premium content available exclusively to our members. For immediate access join now online or by phone at 800-331-8877. Not ready to buy? Schedule a demo or take a free trial.

Schedule a Demo

CalChamber is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy, and we’ll only use your personal information to administer your account and to provide the products and services you requested from us. From time to time, we would like to contact you about our products and services, as well as other content that may be of interest to you. If you consent to us contacting you for this purpose, please tick below to say how you would like us to contact you:

You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For more information on how to unsubscribe, our privacy practices, and how we are committed to protecting and respecting your privacy, please review our Privacy Policy.

By clicking Schedule my demo below, you consent to allow calchamber.com to store and process the personal information submitted above to provide you the content requested.

Website Feedback