Prospective Meal Period Waivers May be Valid, Absent Unconscionability or Coercion

May 08, 2025 | From HRCalifornia Extra

by James W. Ward, J.D.; Employment Law Subject Matter Expert/Legal Writer and Editor, CalChamber

In a recent wage and hour case, a California Court of Appeal handed employers a rare win — concluding for the first time that nonexempt employees’ written prospective or “blanket” meal period waivers for work shifts between five and six hours were valid and enforceable in the absence of any evidence that the waivers were coercive or unconscionable (Bradsbery v. Vicar Operating, Inc., No. B322799 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 21, 2025)).

  • ​​

    Preview​

    This premium content is for our members. For immediate access, join online or by phone at 800-331-8877. Or Start a Free Trial Now for 7 days.

    Already a Member? Sign In Below.

Sign In
Remember Email